Shah said he and his 12-year-old son, who sliced boiled eggs by Shah's side, were too busy to attend the rally. But when asked how he intended to vote in what many observers believe is the most consequential Indian election since 1977, Shah gave a brief shrug.
Shah is a Muslim; the nearby candidate was Narendra Modi, a Hindu nationalist whose relationship with Muslims has been fraught; and India is a country long riven by religious divisions.
"I'm inclined to support Modi," Shah said quietly. "It looks like he's going to win, and why waste your vote by voting for someone who is not going to win?"
Shah's simple question could help determine whether India has a government divided among myriad regional power brokers or one dominated by Modi and his right-of-center Bharatiya Janata Party, or BJP.
Modi's trip to Lucknow on Sunday was the final major event of the pre-election season. India's Election Commission is expected to announce this week the date for national elections, which will be held in April and May.
Polls show that Modi is the nation's most popular politician, but that may not be enough for him to win because political power in India is split among a vast collection of regional parties.
If Modi's party can win here in Uttar Pradesh, India's most populous state, he will be likely to have the mandate he needs to become Prime Minister and undertake the wrenching economic overhauls he has said India must undergo to return to the fast economic growth that at one point poised the country as a democratic rival to China. He has visited the state eight times, and he installed his closest aide to oversee his operation here.
There is an old political saying in India that the way to Delhi goes through Lucknow, the capital of Uttar Pradesh. From an American point of view, Uttar Pradesh has it all: the electoral heft of a California-Ohio-Michigan combination, the uncertainty of a Florida recount, the political tricks of a South Carolina primary and the stark community divisions of Mississippi.
Disgust with the present government and disappointment with the Gandhi political dynasty are so widespread that Modi comes to the election with a huge advantage. But the scale of his success depends in part on whether he can persuade Muslims like Shah to support his candidacy, a difficult challenge. Muslims make up about 14 percent of the country's population, and they have been a crucial part of the support base of the governing party, Indian National Congress, for years.
Modi was chief minister of Gujarat state in 2002 when riots broke out after a Muslim mob set fire to a train carrying Hindu pilgrims, killing 58. Hindu mobs then attacked Muslim neighborhoods over several days.
More than 1,000 people died, mostly Muslims, and women were raped and children burned alive as the police stood by. Modi was never charged in connection with the riots, but some of his close associates were convicted of inciting violence.
He has been linked with a police assassination squad that mostly targeted Muslims. And he spent much of his career rising through the ranks of a right-wing Hindu social organization tied to deadly attacks on Muslims.
Given this history, many Muslim leaders in India say they will neither forgive nor forget Modi's role in the 2002 Gujarat riots. Shakeel Ahmad, chairman of the Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat, said Modi's political success
resulted from demonizing Muslims.
"Modi survives on hatred," Ahmad said in an interview last year.
Syed Husain Afsar, editor of a Muslim-oriented news website in Lucknow, said few Muslims in Uttar Pradesh would vote for Modi.
"This is an election tactic," Afsar said. "Everyone knows he's not secular."
But Modi has presided over an economy in Gujarat that is among the strongest in India, and he has promised to bring to the rest of the country his economic expertise. Few political observers believe he will win over many Muslims, but his outreach could persuade vital regional leaders, who themselves have large Muslim constituencies, that he is an acceptable partner.
"Modi's campaign has been strikingly devoid of anti-Muslim rhetoric," Ashutosh Varshney, a professor of international studies at Brown University, wrote in an emailed response to questions. "Whether that is a sign of ideological evolution remains unclear, but at the very least it is part of a considered strategic decision."
Top Bharatiya Janata Party officials have even suggested that the party could apologize to Muslims for past actions. In his speech Sunday, Modi pointed out that Gujarati Muslims are so much more prosperous than those in Uttar Pradesh that a far greater share in Gujarat apply to undertake the hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca, an important tenet of the Islamic faith.
0 comments:
Post a Comment